IRS audits of higher income taxpayers increase The IRS audited one in eight individuals with incomes over $1
million in fiscal year (FY) 2011. While the overall audit coverage
rate for individuals remained steady at just over one percent, the
a...
Tax gap grows to $450 billion; compliance rate holds steady The "gross tax gap," or the amount of tax owed to the U.S.
government that is not paid on time, climbed from $345 billion in
Tax Year (TY) 2001 to $450 billion in TY 2006, the IRS has
reported. (Be...
MD - Emergency status provided for green energy regulations The Maryland Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive and
Legislative Review (AELR) has granted emergency status for the
corporate and personal income tax regulations pertainin...
PA - DOR updates bulletin on restricted credits The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (DOR) has issued a corporate
income tax bulletin addressing the application of restricted
credits and requirements for selling tax credits. S...
The IRS has released much-anticipated temporary and proposed regulations on the capitalization of costs incurred for tangible property. They impact how virtually any business writes off costs that repair, maintain, improve or replace any tangible property used in the business, from office furniture to roof repairs to photocopy maintenance and everything in between. They apply immediately, to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.
The IRS has released much-anticipated temporary and proposed regulations on the capitalization of costs incurred for tangible property. They impact how virtually any business writes off costs that repair, maintain, improve or replace any tangible property used in the business, from office furniture to roof repairs to photocopy maintenance and everything in between. They apply immediately, to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.
These so-called “repair regulations” are broad and comprehensive. They apply not only to repairs, but to the capitalization of amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property. They are intended to clarify and expand existing regulations, set out some bright-line tests, and provide some safe harbors for deducting payments.
The regulations are an ambitious effort to address capitalization of specific expenses associated with tangible property. The regulations affect manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, and retailers—everyone who uses tangible property, whether the property is owned or leased. The rules provide a more defined framework for determining capital expenditures.
Most taxpayers will have to make changes to their method of accounting to comply with the temporary regulations and will need to file Form 3115. Taxpayers who filed for a change of accounting method following the issuance of the 2008 proposed regulations will probably have to change their accounting method again.
The IRS has promised to issue two revenue procedures that will provide transition rules for taxpayers changing their method of accounting, including the granting of automatic consent to make the change. The regulations require taxpayers to make a Code Sec. 481(a) adjustment; this means that taxpayers will have to apply the regulations to costs incurred both prior to and after the effective date of the regulations.
The new regulations provide rules for materials and supplies that can be deducted, rather than capitalized. The rules provide several methods of accounting for rotable and temporary spare parts, and allow taxpayers to apply a de minimis rule so that they can deduct materials and supplies when they are purchased, not when they are consumed.
Costs to acquire, produce or improve tangible property must be capitalized. The regulations address moving and reinstallation costs, work performed prior to placing property into service, and transaction costs. Generally, costs of simply removing property can be deducted, but costs of moving and then reinstalling property may have to be capitalized.
To determine whether a cost incurred for property is an improvement, it is necessary to determine the unit of property. Generally, the larger the unit of property, the easier it is to deduct expenses, rather than have to capitalize them. The regulations provide detailed rules for determining the unit of property for buildings and for non-building tangible property. For buildings, the IRS identified eight component systems as separate units of property, requiring more costs to be capitalized. However, the new rules also provide for deducting the costs of property taken out of service, by treating the retirement as a disposition.
The new regulations require virtually every business to review how repairs, maintenance, improvements and replacements are handled for tax purposes, with both mandatory and optional adjustments made to past treatment as appropriate.
Please feel free to call this office for a more targeted explanation of how these new regulations impact your business operations.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The fate of the employee-side payroll tax cut along with a host of tax extenders and other expired provisions could be decided in coming weeks. A conference committee of House and Senate members is negotiating a full-year extension of the payroll tax cut and could add some or all of the tax extenders to a final package. Lawmakers also could extend the payroll tax cut without acting on any tax incentives.
The fate of the employee-side payroll tax cut along with a host of tax extenders and other expired provisions could be decided in coming weeks. A conference committee of House and Senate members is negotiating a full-year extension of the payroll tax cut and could add some or all of the tax extenders to a final package. Lawmakers also could extend the payroll tax cut without acting on any tax incentives.
Payroll tax cut
The Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 extended the employee-side OASDI tax cut through the end of February 2012. The employee-share of OASDI taxes is 4.2 percent for the two-month period, rather than 6.2 percent. The employer-share of OASDI taxes remains at 6.2 percent for the two month period. Self-employed individuals also benefit from a two percentage point reduction in OASDI taxes.
Unless extended, the employee-share of OASDI taxes is scheduled to revert to 6.2 percent after February 29, 2012. The White House and the leaders of the two parties in Congress agree that the payroll tax cut should be extended a full-year. They disagree, however, how to pay for the extension; even if it should be paid for at all.
Congress could extend the two-month payroll tax cut through the end of 2012 without paying for it. The 2011 payroll tax cut was unfunded. Congress appropriated to the Social Security trust funds amounts equal to the reduction in payroll tax revenues. The 2011 payroll tax cut was estimated by the Congressional Budget Office cost approximately $111 billion. Extending it through the end of 2012 is estimated to cost just as much if not more.
House Republicans reportedly have proposed a number of revenue raisers to offset the cost of extending the payroll tax cut through the end of 2012. One GOP proposal would extend the current pay freeze for employees of the federal government. Another GOP proposal would require higher-income individuals to pay increased Medicare premiums.
One possible revenue raiser, increasingly under discussion by Democrats, is a change in the taxation of so-called carried interest. Current law generally taxes carried interest as capital gains and not as ordinary income. Past efforts to change the tax treatment of carried interest have failed to pass Congress.
Extenders
The so-called tax extenders, popular but temporary tax provisions, expired at the end of 2011. Many taxpayers are surprised to learn that their particular tax break, whether it be the state or local sales tax deduction, the teachers’ classroom expense deduction, or the research tax credit, are temporary. The extenders have been routinely revived many times in the past. This year, however, could be different. Faced with record federal budget deficits, lawmakers may decide to extend only some of the expired provisions.
President Obama’s FY 2013 proposals
President Obama is expected to release his fiscal year (FY) 2013 federal budget proposals in early February, which will reignite debate over the Bush-era tax cuts. President Obama is expected to urge Congress to allow the Bush-era tax cuts to expire after 2012 for higher-income taxpayers, which President Obama defines as individuals earning more than $200,000 or families earning more than $250,000. In recent weeks, there has been speculation that President Obama may revisit those definitions in his FY 2013 budget, possibly raising the amounts.
Few Capitol Hill observers expect Congress to take any action on the Bush-era tax cuts before the November elections. Instead, Congress may take up some of President Obama’s other proposals. As in past budgets, President Obama will likely propose to extend some energy tax breaks for individuals and businesses, extend tax incentives for education and provide some targeted-tax breaks to businesses. President Obama has also promised to introduce proposals to encourage U.S. companies to “insource” jobs at home.
On some issues, such as energy and education, lawmakers may find common ground but negotiations are likely to go down to the wire. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
If you have any questions about the payroll tax cut, tax extenders or the various tax proposals under discussion, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The IRS reopened its offshore voluntary disclosure program in early 2012 in response to what the government described as strong interest among taxpayers. The reopened program, the third of its type in recent years, encourages taxpayers with unreported foreign accounts to make full disclosures in exchange for a reduced penalty framework. Like its predecessors, the terms and conditions of the reopened program are very complex. The IRS has promised to provide more details. In the meantime, the prior offshore disclosure programs are guides to how the IRS intends to implement the third, reopened program.
The IRS reopened its offshore voluntary disclosure program in early 2012 in response to what the government described as strong interest among taxpayers. The reopened program, the third of its type in recent years, encourages taxpayers with unreported foreign accounts to make full disclosures in exchange for a reduced penalty framework. Like its predecessors, the terms and conditions of the reopened program are very complex. The IRS has promised to provide more details. In the meantime, the prior offshore disclosure programs are guides to how the IRS intends to implement the third, reopened program.
Previous disclosure programs
The IRS launched two previous offshore disclosure initiatives: one in 2009 and another in 2011. Both programs offered reduced penalties in exchange for full disclosure. In early 2012, the IRS reported it received 33,000 voluntary disclosures from the 2009 and 2011 offshore initiatives. The government has collected over $4.4 billion from the 2009 and 2011 programs. The IRS predicted it will collect more revenue as it continues to work cases.
Reopened program
The reopened program operates very similarly to the 2009 and 2011 programs but with some key differences. The previous programs were temporary. The 2011 program ended in mid-September 2011. The reopened program has no set end date. The IRS cautioned, however, that it could close the program at some future date. The decision to end the program is solely at the discretion of the IRS.
The reopened program requires taxpayers to file all original and amended tax returns and include payment for back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as pay accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties. Additionally, taxpayers must pay a penalty of 27.5 percent of the highest aggregate balance in foreign bank accounts/entities or value of foreign assets during the eight full tax years prior to the disclosure. In comparison, the highest penalty in the 2011 program was 25 percent. IRS officials have said that the penalty was increased because the agency does not want to reward taxpayers who did not participate in the 2009 or 2011 disclosure programs because they anticipated that a future penalty would be lower.
In limited circumstances, taxpayers may qualify for a 12.5 percent penalty or a five percent penalty. Generally, taxpayers whose offshore accounts or assets did not surpass $75,000 in any calendar year may qualify for the 12.5 percent penalty.
The requirements for the five percent penalty are very narrow. The IRS has explained that taxpayers must meet four conditions: (1) The taxpayer did not open or cause the account to be opened; (2) the taxpayer exercised minimal, infrequent contact with the account, for example, to request the account balance, or update account holder information such as a change in address, contact person, or email address; (3) except for a withdrawal closing the account and transferring the funds to an account in the United States, the taxpayer did not withdraw more than $1,000 from the account in any year for which the taxpayer was non-compliant; and (4) the taxpayer can show that all applicable U.S. taxes have been paid on funds deposited to the account (only account earnings have escaped U.S. taxation).
The penalty amounts in the reopened program are not set in stone, the IRS cautioned. It may eventually increase penalties in the program for all or some taxpayers or defined classes of taxpayers.
Quiet disclosures
One goal of the three programs is to caution taxpayers against so-called “quiet disclosures.” A quiet disclosure occurs when a taxpayer files an amended return and pays any tax delinquency without making a formal voluntary disclosure. The IRS warned taxpayers making quiet disclosures that they risked being sanctioned to the fullest extent allowed by law.
Critics
The offshore disclosure programs were not without their critics. The National Taxpayer Advocate recently told Congress that the IRS should streamline what is a very complicated process. The National Taxpayer Advocate also reported that IRS examiners were assuming that all violations were willful unless a taxpayer presented evidence to the contrary. It is possible that the IRS may revisit some of the terms and conditions of the reopened program in light of the National Taxpayer Advocate’s report.
If you have any questions about the reopened offshore voluntary disclosure program, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Taxpayers with children should be aware of the numerous tax breaks for which they may qualify. Among them are: the dependency exemption, child tax credit, child care credit, and adoption credit. As they get older, education tax credits for higher education may be available; as is a new tax code requirement for employer-sponsored health care to cover young adults up to age 26. Employers of parents with young children may also qualify for the child care assistance credit.
Taxpayers with children should be aware of the numerous tax breaks for which they may qualify. Among them are: the dependency exemption, child tax credit, child care credit, and adoption credit. As they get older, education tax credits for higher education may be available; as is a new tax code requirement for employer-sponsored health care to cover young adults up to age 26. Employers of parents with young children may also qualify for the child care assistance credit.
Dependency Exemption
In addition to the personal exemption an individual taxpayer may take for him or herself to reduce taxable income (Line 42 on Form 1040), that taxpayer may also take an exemption for each qualifying dependent who has lived with the taxpayer for more than half of the tax year. A dependent may be a natural child, step-child, step-sibling, half-sibling, adopted child, eligible foster child, or grandchild, and generally must be under age 19, a full-time student under age 24, or have special needs. The amount of the exemption is the same as the taxpayer’s personal exemption, $3,700 for the 2011 tax year and $3,800 for the 2012 tax year.
Child Tax Credit
Parents of children who are under age 17 at the end of the tax year may qualify for a refundable $1,000 tax credit. The credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction of tax liability, and may be listed on Line 51 of Form 1040. For every $1,000 of adjusted gross income above the threshold limit ($110,000 for married joint filers; $75,000 for single filers), the amount of the credit decreases by $50.
Child and Dependent Care Credit
If a taxpayer must pay for childcare for a child under age 13 in order to pursue or maintain gainful employment, he or she may claim up to $3,000 of his or her eligible expenses for dependent care. If one parent stays home full-time, however, no child care costs are eligible for the credit.
Adoption Credit
Taxpayers who have incurred qualified adoption expenses in 2011 may claim either a $13,360 credit against tax owed or a $13,360 income exclusion if the taxpayer has received payments or reimbursements from his or her employer for adoption expenses. For 2012, the amount of the credit will decrease to $12,650, and in 2013 to $5,000.
Higher Education Credits
There are two education-related credits available for 2012: the American Opportunity credit and the lifetime learning credit. The American Opportunity credit amount is the sum of 100 percent of the first $2,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses plus 25 percent of the next $2,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses, for a total maximum credit of $2,500 per eligible student per year. The credit is available for the first four years of a student's post-secondary education. The credit amount phases out ratably for taxpayers with modified AGI between $80,000 and $90,000 ($160,000 and $180,000 for joint filers). The lifetime learning credit is equal to 20 percent of the amount of qualified tuition expenses paid on the first $10,000 of tuition per family. The phaseout for 2012 ranges from $52,000 to $62,000 ($104,000 to $124,000 for joint filers). Parents also find tax relief in saving for college though Coverdell accounts, section 529 plans and specified U.S.. savings bonds.
Extended Health Care Coverage
Effective since September 23, 2010, the new health care law requires plans to provide coverage for children until they attain age 26. Further, effective on or after March 30, 2010, children under the age of 27 are considered dependents of a taxpayer for purposes of the general exclusion from income for reimbursements for medical care expenses of an employee, spouse, and dependents under an employer-provided accident or health plan. Therefore, a plan must provide coverage to a child who is still a dependent up to age 26; but can do so up to age 27 without income tax consequences. A child includes a son, daughter, stepson, or stepdaughter of the taxpayer; a foster child placed with the taxpayer by an authorized placement agency or by judgment, decree, or other order of any court of competent jurisdiction; and a legally adopted child of the taxpayer or a child who has been lawfully placed with the taxpayer for legal adoption.
Child Care Assistance Credit (for businesses)
Employers may take up to $150,000 of the eligible costs of providing employees with child care assistance as tax credit. These costs may include a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing, improving, and operating a child care facility.
If you have any questions about these provisions and how they may benefit you, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The Treasury Department is authorized to offset a taxpayer’s tax refund to satisfy certain debts. A spouse who believes that his or her portion of the refund should not be used to offset the debt that the other spouse owes may request a refund from the IRS.
The Treasury Department is authorized to offset a taxpayer’s tax refund to satisfy certain debts. A spouse who believes that his or her portion of the refund should not be used to offset the debt that the other spouse owes may request a refund from the IRS.
Offset
If an individual owes money to the federal government because of a delinquent debt, the Treasury Department’s Financial Management Service (FMS) can offset that individual's tax refund (and certain other federal payments) to satisfy the debt. The debtor will be notified in advance of the offset.
A taxpayer’s refund may be reduced by FMS and offset to pay:
Past-due child support
Federal agency non-tax debts
State income tax obligations, or
Certain unemployment compensation debts owed a state.
FMS advises taxpayers by written notice of an offset. FMS has explained that the notice will reflect the original refund amount, the taxpayer’s offset amount, the agency receiving the payment, and the address and telephone number of the agency. FMS will notify the IRS of the amount taken from your refund.
Form 8379
If a taxpayer filed a joint return and is not responsible for the debt of his or her spouse, the taxpayer may request his or her portion of the refund by filing Form 8379, Injured Spouse Allocation, with the IRS. Form 8379 may be filed with the original return or by itself after the taxpayer is aware of the offset.
The IRS has instructed taxpayers filing Form 8379 by itself to attach a copy of all Forms W-2 and W-2G for both spouses, and any Forms 1099 showing federal income tax withholding to Form 8379. Failure to attach these items may result in a delay in processing by the IRS.
The IRS has reported on its website that it generally processes Forms 8379 that are filed after a joint return has been filed in approximately eight weeks. The timeframe for processing a Form 8379 that is attached to a joint return is approximately 11 weeks (14 weeks if the joint return is filed on paper).
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of February 2012.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of February 2012.
February 1
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates January 25–27.
February 3
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates January 28–31.
February 8
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 1–3.
February 10
Employees who work for tips. Employees who received $20 or more in tips during November must report them to their employer using Form 4070.
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 4–7.
February 15
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 8–10.
Monthly depositors. Monthly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payments in January.
February 17
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 11–14.
February 23
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 15–17.
February 24
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 18–21.
February 29
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 22–24.
March 2
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 25–28.
March 7
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 29–March 2.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The small business health insurance tax credit, created by the health care reform package, rewards employers that offer health insurance to their employees with a tax break. The credit is targeted to small employers; generally employers with 25 or fewer employees. In May 2010, the IRS issued Notice 2010-44, which describes the steps employers take to determine eligibility for the credit and how to calculate the credit.
The small business health insurance tax credit, created by the health care reform package, rewards employers that offer health insurance to their employees with a tax break. The credit is targeted to small employers; generally employers with 25 or fewer employees. In May 2010, the IRS issued Notice 2010-44, which describes the steps employers take to determine eligibility for the credit and how to calculate the credit.
Initial steps
1. Determine the employees taken into account for purposes of the credit.
Generally, any employee who performs services for you during the tax year is taken into account in determining your full-time employees (FTEs), average wages, and premiums paid. However partners and certain business owners are excluded. Additionally, family members of these owners and partners are also not taken into account as employees.
Example. A partnership employs five individuals, including one of the partners, Elise, and her spouse, Ron. For purposes of the credit, Elise and Ron are not taken into account as employees in determining the number of FTEs for purposes of the credit.
2. Determine the number of hours of service performed by those employees.
An employee's hours of service include (1) each hour for which an employee is paid, or entitled to payment, for the performance of duties for the employer during the employer's tax year; and (2) each hour for which an employee is paid, or entitled to payment, by the employer on account of vacation, holiday, illness, and similar events. The IRS allows you to use one of three alternative methods to calculate hours of service: (1) actual hours of service; (2) days-worked equivalency; or (3) weeks-worked equivalency.
Example. Priscilla is an employee of ABC Co. ABC's payroll records show that Priscilla worked 2,000 hours and was paid for an additional 80 hours on account of vacation, holiday and illness in 2010. Priscilla performed 2,080 hours of service.
3. Calculate the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees.
Employers use a formula to calculate the number of FTEs. Total hours of service credited during the year to qualified employees (but not more than 2,080 hours for any employee) are divided by 2,080. The result, if not a whole number, is then rounded to the next lowest whole number.
Example. An employer pays five employees wages for 2,080 hours each, pays three employees wages for 1,040 hours each, and pays one employee wages for 2,300 hours. The employer's FTEs would be calculated as follows:
(1) Total hours of service not exceeding 2,080 per employee is the sum of:
(a) 10,400 hours of service for the five employees paid for 2,080 hours each (5 x 2,080);
(b) 3,120 hours of service for the three employees paid for 1,040 hours each (3 x 1,040); and
(c) 2,080 hours of service for the one employee paid for 2,300 hours (the lesser of 2,300 and 2,080).
The sum of (a), (b) and (c) equals 15,600 hours of service.
(2) The hours of service -- 15,600 -- are divided by 2,080, which equals 7.5. That number is rounded to the next lowest whole number, which is seven. The employer has seven FTEs.
4. Determine the average annual wages paid per FTE.
Employers also use a formula to determine average annual wages paid for a tax year. The amount of total wages paid to qualified employees is divided by the number of the employer's FTEs for the year. The result is then rounded down to the nearest $1,000 (if not otherwise a multiple of $1,000).
Example. XYZ Co. has 10 FTEs and pays average annual wages of $224,000 for the 2010 tax year. The amount of XYZ's average annual wages is $224,000 divided by 10, which equals $22,400. When rounded down to the nearest $1,000, is $22,000.
5. Determine the amount of premiums paid by the employer.
Only premiums paid by the employer for health insurance coverage are counted in calculating the credit. If an employer pays only a portion of the premiums for the coverage provided to employees (with employees paying the rest), only the portion paid by the employer is taken into account.
However, an employer's premium payments are not taken into account for purposes of the credit unless the payments are for health insurance coverage under a qualifying arrangement. Generally, this is an arrangement under which the employer pays premiums for each employee enrolled in health insurance coverage offered by the employer in an amount equal to a uniform percentage (not less than 50 percent) of the premium cost of the coverage.
Additionally, the amount of an employer's premium payments taken into account in calculating the credit is limited to the premium payments the employer would have made under the same arrangement if the average premium for the small group market in the state (or an area within the state) in which the employer offers coverage were substituted for the actual premium.
Example. MNO Co. offers a health insurance plan with single and family coverage to its nine FTEs with average annual wages of $23,000 per FTE. Four employees are enrolled in single coverage and five are enrolled in family coverage.
MNO pays 50 percent of the premiums for all employees enrolled in single coverage and 50 percent of the premiums for all employees enrolled in family coverage. The premiums are $4,000 a year for single coverage and $10,000 a year for family coverage. The average premium for the small group market in employer's State is $5,000 for single coverage and $12,000 for family coverage.
MNO's premium payments for each FTE ($2,000 for single coverage and $5,000 for family coverage) do not exceed 50 percent of the average premium for the small group market in employer's state ($2,500 for single coverage and $6,000 for family coverage).
The amount of premiums paid by the employer for purposes of computing the credit equals $33,000 ((4 x $2,000) + (5 x $5,000) = $33,000).
Calculating the credit
After determining eligibility for the credit, employers calculate the amount of their credit. The maximum credit is 35 percent for employers with 10 or fewer FTEs paying average annual wages of not more than $25,000. The maximum credit for a tax-exempt employer is 25 percent. The maximum 35 percent and 25 percent credits are available for 2010 through 2013. The maximum amounts rise for 2014 and 2015, but at that time the credit is linked to an employer's participation in a state insurance exchange.
The credit is subject to phase-out. The credit is reduced by 6.667 percent for each FTE in excess of 10 employees and by four percent for each $1,000 that average annual compensation paid to an employee exceeds $25,000.
The following examples illustrate calculation of the credit:
Small for-profit employer
PRS Co. employs nine FTEs with average annual wages of $23,000 per FTE for the 2010 tax year. PRS pays $72,000 in health insurance premiums for those employees (which does not exceed the average premium for the small group market in the employer's state) and otherwise meets the requirements for the credit. PRS's credit for 2010 is $25,200 (35 percent x $72,000).
Small tax-exempt employer
TUV employs 10 FTES with average annual wages of $21,000 per FTE for the 2010 tax year. TUV pays $80,000 in health insurance premiums for its employees (which does not exceed the average premium for the small group market in the employer's state) and otherwise meets the requirements for the credit. The total amount of the employer's income tax and Medicare tax withholding plus the employer's share of the Medicare tax equals $30,000 in 2010.
The credit is calculated as follows: (1) The initial amount of the credit is determined before any reduction: (25 percent x $80,000) = $20,000; (2) The employer's withholding and Medicare taxes are $30,000; (3) the total 2010 tax credit equals $20,000 (the lesser of $20,000 and $30,000).
We've covered a lot of material. Please contact our office if you have any questions about the small employer health insurance tax credit.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The health care reform package makes two important changes to insurance coverage for young adults. First, the new law allows young adults to remain on their parents' health insurance plan until age 26. Second, the new law extends certain favorable tax treatment to coverage for young adults.
The health care reform package makes two important changes to insurance coverage for young adults. First, the new law allows young adults to remain on their parents' health insurance plan until age 26. Second, the new law extends certain favorable tax treatment to coverage for young adults.
Extended coverage
Traditionally, many plans and insurers would remove adult children from their parents' policies because of age, status as a student, or residence. Under the new law, plans and insurers that offer dependent coverage must offer coverage to an enrollee's adult children until age 26, even if the young adult no longer lives with his or her parents, is not a dependent on a parent's federal tax return or is no longer a student. Married and unmarried young adults are covered but not their children.
Let's look at an example:
Anita is 22 years old, is a full-time student and expects to graduate from college school in 2011. Anita is covered by her mother's employer-provided health insurance. Before the new law, the plan would have terminated coverage for Anita after her 23rd birthday or when she graduated from college, whichever came first. The health care reform package requires the plan to make coverage available until Anita reaches age 26.
The expansion up to age 26 is effective for plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010. Many insurance companies have agreed to implement the new requirement before the effective date. These insurance companies will voluntarily continue coverage for young adults with no break in coverage.
Keep in mind that the new law does not compel a plan or insurer to offer dependent coverage. But if a plan does offer dependent coverage, the new law requires such plans to extend that coverage until a child reaches age 26.
There is one important exception. If a young adult is eligible to obtain health insurance from his or her employer, the parent's plan is not obligated to extend coverage to age 26. This exception is temporary: starting in 2014, children up to age 26 can stay on their parent's employer plan even if their own employer offers coverage.
Income tax exclusion
Before passage of the health care reform package, employer-provided health insurance coverage was generally excluded from income if the employee's child was under age 19 or under age 24 if a student. The new law extends the income tax exclusion to any employee's child who has not attained age 27 as of the end of the tax year. For most individuals, this is the calendar year. Although a health plan will be required to cover a dependent up to age 26, the plan may be more generous and provide for coverage through the end of the year in which the adult child celebrates his or her 26th birthday.
Under the new law, it is also no longer necessary for the child of the employee to be a dependent of the employee for the income tax exclusion to apply. A child for purposes of the extended exclusion is an individual who is the son, daughter, stepson, or stepdaughter of the employee. The definition of child also includes adopted children and eligible foster children.
Let's look at an example:
Amy works for ABC Co. which provides health care coverage for its employees and their spouses and for any employee's child who has not attained age 27 as of the end of the tax year. For the 2010 tax year, ABC provides health care coverage to Amy and her son Jason, who will not attain age 27 until after the end of the 2010 tax year. The health care reform package treats Jason as a child of Amy. Accordingly, and because Jason will not attain age 27 during the 2010 tax year, the health care coverage for Jason under ABC's plan is excluded from Amy's gross income.
The IRS and other federal agencies have published guidance about all the changes affecting young adults in the health care reform package. Employers, plans and insurers are also alerting taxpayers about the changes. Please contact our office if you have any questions.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) imposes a new 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax on the investment income of higher-income individuals. Although the tax does not take effect until 2013, it is not too soon to examine methods to lessen the impact of the tax.
The health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) imposes a new 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax on the investment income of higher-income individuals. Although the tax does not take effect until 2013, it is not too soon to examine methods to lessen the impact of the tax.
Net investment income
"Net investment income" includes interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents and other gross income attributable to a passive activity. Gains from the sale of property not used in an active business and income from the investment of working capital are also treated as investment income. Further, an individual's capital gains income will be subject to the tax. This includes gain from the sale of a principal residence, unless the gain is excluded from income under Code Sec. 121, and gains from the sale of a vacation home. However, contemplated sales made before 2013 would avoid the tax.
The tax applies to estates and trusts, on the lesser of undistributed net income or the excess of the trust/estate adjusted gross income (AGI) over the threshold amount ($11,200) for the highest tax bracket for trusts and estates, and to investment income they distribute.
However, the tax will not apply to nontaxable income, such as tax-exempt interest or veterans' benefits.
Deductions
Net investment income is gross income or net gain, reduced by deductions that are "properly allocable" to the income or gain. This is a key term that the Treasury Department expects to address in guidance, and which we will update on developments. For passively-managed real property, allocable expenses will still include depreciation and operating expenses. Indirect expenses such as tax preparation fees may also qualify.
For capital gain property, this formula puts a premium on keeping tabs on amounts that increase your property's basis. It also focuses on investment expenses that may reduce net gains: interest on loans to purchase investments, investment counsel and advice, and fees to collect income. Other costs, such as brokers' fees, may increase basis or reduce the amount realized from an investment. As such, taxpayers may want to consider avoiding installment sales with net capital gains (and interest) running past 2012.
Thresholds
The tax applies to the lesser of net investment income or modified AGI above $200,000 for individuals and heads of household, $250,000 for joint filers and surviving spouses, and $125,000 for married filing separately. MAGI is your AGI increased by any foreign earned income otherwise excluded under Code Sec. 911; MAGI is the same as AGI for someone who does not work overseas.
Example. Jim, a single individual, has modified AGI of $220,000 and net investment income of $40,000. The tax applies to the lesser of (i) net investment income ($40,000) or (ii) modified AGI ($220,000) over the threshold amount for an individual ($200,000), or $20,000. The tax is 3.8 percent of $20,000, or $760. In this case, the tax is not applied to the entire $40,000 of investment income.
Exceptions to the tax
Certain items and taxpayers are not subject to the 3.8 percent Medicare tax. A significant exception applies to distributions from qualified plans, 401(k) plans, tax-sheltered annuities, individual retirement accounts (IRAs), and eligible 457 plans. There is no exception for distributions from nonqualified deferred compensation plans subject to Code Sec. 409A. However, distributions from these plans (including amounts deemed as interest) are generally treated as compensation, not as investment income.
The exception for distributions from retirement plans suggests that potentially taxable investors may want to shift wages and investments to retirement plans such as 401(k) plans, 403(b) annuities, and IRAs, or to 409A deferred compensation plans. Increasing contributions will reduce income and may help you stay below the applicable thresholds. Small business owners may want to set up retirement plans, especially 401(k) plans, if they have not yet established a plan, and should consider increasing their contributions to existing plans.
Another exception is provided for income ordinarily derived from a trade or business that is not a passive activity under Code Sec. 469, such as a sole proprietorship. Investment income from an active trade or business is also excluded. However, SECA (Self-Employment Contributions Act) tax will still apply to proprietors and partners. Income from trading in financial instruments and commodities is also subject to the tax.
The additional 3.8 percent Medicare tax does not apply to income from the sale of an interest in a partnership or S corporation, to the extent that gain of the entity's property would be from an active trade or business. The tax also does not apply to business entities (such as corporations and limited liability companies), nonresident aliens (NRAs), charitable trusts that are tax-exempt, and charitable remainder trusts that are nontaxable under Code Sec. 664.
Income tax rates
In addition to the tax on investment income, certain other tax increases proposed by the Obama administration may take effect in 2011. The top two marginal income tax rates on individuals would rise from 33 and 35 percent to 36 and 39.6 percent, respectively. The maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains would increase from 15 percent to 20 percent. Moreover, dividends, which are currently capped at the 15 percent long-term capital gain rate, would be taxed as ordinary income. Thus, the cumulative rate on capital gains would increase to 23.8 percent in 2013, and the rate on dividends would jump to as much as 43.4 percent. Moreover, the thresholds are not indexed for inflation, so more taxpayers may be affected as time elapses.
Please contact our office if you would like to discuss the tax consequences to your investments of the new 3.8 percent Medicare tax on investment income.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
There are two important energy tax credits that can benefit homeowners in 2010: (1) the nonbusiness energy property credit and (2) the residential energy efficient property credit. Collectively, they are known as the "home energy tax credits." With the home energy tax credits, you can not only lower your utility bill by making energy-saving improvements to your home, but you can lower your tax bill in 2010 as well. Eligible taxpayers can claim the credits regardless of whether or not they itemize their deductions on Schedule A. Your costs for making these energy improvements are treated as paid when the installation of the item is completed.
There are two important energy tax credits that can benefit homeowners in 2010: (1) the nonbusiness energy property credit and (2) the residential energy efficient property credit. Collectively, they are known as the "home energy tax credits." With the home energy tax credits, you can not only lower your utility bill by making energy-saving improvements to your home, but you can lower your tax bill in 2010 as well. Eligible taxpayers can claim the credits regardless of whether or not they itemize their deductions on Schedule A. Your costs for making these energy improvements are treated as paid when the installation of the item is completed.
Nonbusiness energy property credit
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) extended the nonbusiness energy credit for 2009 and 2010. The nonbusiness property credit equals 30 percent of a homeowner's expenses on eligible energy-saving improvements, up to $1,500 for both the 2009 and 2010 tax years. Qualifying expenses include costs of certain high-efficiency heating and air conditioning systems, water heaters and stoves that burn biomass, asphalt roofs, as well as costs associated with the installation of these items. The costs of energy-efficient windows, skylights, and doors, and qualifying insulation also qualify for the credit. However, the costs of installing these items do not qualify. Since the credit amounts are combined for both 2009 and 2010, if you made energy improvements in 2009 to which you claimed part of the expenses, you must take that into consideration when claiming the credit in 2010 for qualified expenses. The credit applies only to your principal residence, and special rules apply to condo owners.
Residential energy efficient property credit
The credit rate for the residential energy property credit equals 30 percent of the cost of all qualifying improvements. The residential energy efficient property credit can be claimed for solar electric systems, solar hot water heaters, geothermal heat pumps, wind turbines, and fuel cell property. Generally, labor costs are included when calculating this credit. No cap exists on the amount of the credit available, except in the case of fuel cell property.
Caution. As in the case of the nonbusiness energy property credit, not all energy-efficient improvements qualify for this tax credit. As such, you should check the manufacturer's tax credit certification statement before purchasing or installing any energy-efficient property. We can help you determine your eligibility based on a certification statement.
Reporting
Both energy credits are claimed by eligible homeowners when they file their 2010 federal income tax return. While you do not get an immediate check from Uncle Sam since you claim it on your 2010 return filed in 2011, you might be able to lower your estimated tax payments or withholding immediately to enjoy the benefits of the credit earlier.
Both the nonbusiness energy property credit and the residential energy property credit are claimed and figured on Form 5695, Residential Energy Credits. Since these are credits, not deductions, they increase a taxpayer's refund or reduce the tax he or she owes. An eligible taxpayer can claim these credits, regardless of whether he or she itemizes deductions on Schedule A. Use Form 5695, Residential Energy Credits, to figure and claim these credits. Certain other credits you claim for the 2010 tax year, if any, will affect your computation of the home energy credits.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The answer is no for 2010, but yes, in practical terms, for 2014 and beyond. The health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) does not require individuals to carry health insurance in 2010. However, after 2013, individuals without minimum essential health insurance coverage will be liable for a penalty unless otherwise exempt.
The answer is no for 2010, but yes, in practical terms, for 2014 and beyond. The health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) does not require individuals to carry health insurance in 2010. However, after 2013, individuals without minimum essential health insurance coverage will be liable for a penalty unless otherwise exempt.
Shared responsibility
The health care reform package describes health insurance coverage as "shared responsibility." Individuals, employers, the federal government, and the states all have roles to play in guaranteeing that individuals do not lack minimum essential health insurance coverage.
The health care reform package assumes that employer-provided health insurance will continue to be the primary means of delivering coverage after 2013. The health care reform package includes measures that lawmakers hope will keep premium costs down along with tax incentives, so employers continue to offer health insurance. For larger employers (those with 50 or more employees), that "encouragement" is also combined with penalties if alternate health insurance is not offered.
Millions of Americans are also currently covered by Medicaid, Medicare and other government programs. They will continue to be covered by these programs after 2013. Indeed, some of these government programs will be expanded between now and 2013, covering more individuals.
Individual responsibility
Beginning in 2014, the health care reform package imposes a penalty on individuals for each month they fail to have minimum essential health insurance coverage for themselves and their dependents. Another name for the penalty is "shared responsibility payment."
As a baseline, all individuals without minimum essential health insurance coverage will be liable for the penalty. However, the health care reform package expressly excludes certain individuals from liability for the penalty. They include:
Individuals whose household income is below their income thresholds for filing a federal income tax return;
Individuals who are exempt on religious conscience grounds;
Individuals whose contribution to employer-provided coverage exceeds a threshold percentage;
Hardship cases;
Native Americans;
Undocumented aliens;
Incarcerated individuals;
Individuals with short lapses of minimum essential coverage;
Individuals covered by Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs; and
Certain individuals outside the U.S.
Amount of penalty
The monthly penalty after 2013 is 1/12 of the flat dollar amount or a percentage of income, whichever is greater. For 2014, the flat dollar amount is $95 and the percentage of income is one percent. The flat dollar amount rises to $695 in 2016 (indexed for inflation thereafter) and the percentage of income increases to 2.5 percent.
For individuals under age 18, the flat dollar amount is 50 percent of the amount for adults. Generally, a family's total penalty cannot exceed $285 for 2014 (rising to $2,085 by 2016) or the national average annual premium for the "bronze" level of coverage through a state insurance exchange. By 2014, each state must establish an insurance exchange where individuals can shop for health insurance coverage. The exchanges will have four levels of coverage: bronze, silver, gold, and platinum.
Example. Ana, age 38, is self-employed with a modified adjusted gross income (AGI) of $68,500 for 2014. Ana does not have minimum essential coverage for all 12 months of 2014 and is not exempt from carrying minimum essential coverage because of income or other qualifying reasons. Ana will be liable for a penalty of the greater of $95 or one percent of her modified AGI.
Example. Ana's mother, Barbara, is enrolled in Medicare. Barbara has minimum essential coverage because she is enrolled in Medicare and is not liable for a penalty.
Health insurance tax credits
At the same time the individual responsibility requirement kicks in, the health care reform package provides a refundable health insurance premium assistance tax credit to qualified persons. The premium assistance credit will operate on a sliding scale based on an individual's relationship to the federal poverty level (between 100 and 400 percent).
The healthcare reform package makes the premium assistance tax credit refundable and also provides for advance payment of the credit. Advance payment will be made to the health plan in which the individual is enrolled.
Adult children
There is one important change regarding individual coverage for 2010. Effective September 23, 2010, the health care reform package enables more young adults to remain on their parents' health insurance policies. Generally, employer-sponsored group health plans will be required to provide coverage for adult children up to age 26 if the adult child is ineligible to enroll in another employer-sponsored plan. The health care reform package also extends the employer-provided health coverage gross income exclusion to coverage for adult children under age 27 as of the end of the tax year.
Guidance
The IRS, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies are expected to issue extensive guidance on the individual responsibility mandate. Our office will keep you posted on developments.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The IRS is moving quickly to alert employers about a new tax credit for health insurance premiums. The recently enacted health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) created the small employer health insurance tax credit. The temporary credit is targeted to small employers that offer or will offer health insurance coverage to their employees. The credit, like so many federal tax incentives, has certain qualifications. Please contact our office and we can arrange to review in detail how the credit may cut the cost of your business's health insurance premiums. The dollar benefits of the credit are substantial and they apply immediately to 2010 premium costs.
The IRS is moving quickly to alert employers about a new tax credit for health insurance premiums. The recently enacted health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) created the small employer health insurance tax credit. The temporary credit is targeted to small employers that offer or will offer health insurance coverage to their employees. The credit, like so many federal tax incentives, has certain qualifications. Please contact our office and we can arrange to review in detail how the credit may cut the cost of your business's health insurance premiums. The dollar benefits of the credit are substantial and they apply immediately to 2010 premium costs.
Outreach
The IRS is sending postcards to more than four million small businesses in coming weeks. The postcards briefly describe the new tax credit and are just one part of the IRS's outreach campaign to educate employers about the credit. The IRS has also created a special page on its web site on the credit along with a fact sheet and frequently asked questions and answers.
Maximum credit
The new health care credit is effective immediately so employers need to plan now to take advantage of it. The credit, which is available over the next five years, also rises over time but the enhanced credit comes with some additional requirements.
For tax years beginning in 2010 through 2013, the maximum credit reaches 35 percent of qualified premium costs paid by for-profit employers. The maximum credit is 25 percent of qualified premium costs paid by tax-exempt employers.
The maximum credit climbs to 50 percent of qualified premium costs paid by for-profit employers (35 percent for tax-exempt employers) for tax years beginning in 2014 through 2015. However, Congress imposed some additional requirements. An employer may claim the credit only if it offers one or more qualified health plans through a state insurance exchange. The health care reform package requires states to create insurance exchanges by January 1, 2014.
Example. ABC Co. employs nine individuals with average annual wages of $23,000 for each employee in 2010. ABC pays $72,000 in health care premiums for its employees. This amount does not exceed the average premium for the small group market in the state in which ABC offers coverage and ABC otherwise meets the requirements for the credit. ABC's credit for 2010 is $25,200 (35 percent x $72,000).
Tax-exempt employers have additional limitations. If the amount of their credit exceeds the amount of payroll taxes of the tax-exempt employer during the calendar year in which the tax year begins, the credit is limited to the amount of payroll taxes.
FTEs
The maximum credit is available to qualified employers with no more than 10 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees paying average annual wages of $25,000 or less. The credit completely phases out if an employer has 25 or more FTEs or pays $50,000 or more in average annual wages. Effectively, a small employer can have exactly 25 FTEs or pay average annual compensation of exactly $50,000 and not receive a credit under the phase-out rules. The monetary amounts are adjusted for inflation after 2013.
The health care reform package explains how to calculate the number of FTEs. The number of an employer's FTEs is determined by dividing the total hours for which the employer pays wages to employees during the year (but not more than 2,080 hours for any employee) by 2,080. The result, if not a whole number, is rounded to the next lowest whole number. Lawmakers selected 2,080 hours because 2,080 hours comprise the number of hours in a 52-week assuming a 40-hour work week. Any hours beyond 2,080, such as overtime hours, are not taken into account when calculating FTEs.
Example. ABC Co has nine employees. ABC pays Aidan, Bonnie, Catherine, David, and Eddie wages for 2,080 hours each for 2010. ABC pays Francine, Gary and Harry wages for 1,040 hours each for 2010. ABC pays Kieran wages for 2,300 hours for 2010. The total hours not exceeding 2,080 per employee is the sum of: --10,400 hours for the five employees paid for 2,080 hours each (5 x 2,080) plus --3,120 hours for the three employees paid for 1,040 hours each (3 x 1,040) plus --2,080 hours for the one employee paid for 2,300 hours (lesser of 2,300 and 2,080), which add up to 15,600 hours.
To calculate the number of FTEs, 15,600 is divided by 2,080, which results in 7.5, rounded to the next lowest whole number.
Average annual wages
A formula is also used to calculate average annual wages. The amount of average annual wages is determined by first dividing the total wages paid by the employer to employees during the employer's tax year by the number of the employer's FTEs for the year. The result is then rounded down to the nearest $1,000 (if not otherwise a multiple of $1,000).
Example. ABC Co. pays $224,000 in wages and has 10 FTEs. ABC's average annual wages are $224,000 divided by 10 which equals $22,400, and is rounded down to the nearest $1,000 for a final number of $22,000
Owners and family members
Some individuals are excluded from the calculation of FTEs and average annual wages. These include a sole proprietor, a partner in a partnership, a shareholder owning more than two percent of an S corporation, and any owner of more than five percent of other businesses. Certain family members of these individuals are also excluded from the calculation of FTEs and average annual wages. These include a child, a parent, a sibling, and others. This list is not exhaustive. Please contact our office for more details about who is excluded from these calculations.
Premium deduction
Employers generally may deduct the cost of health insurance premiums paid on behalf of employees. The health care reform package does not change this general rule. However, the amount of premiums that an employer may deduct is reduced by the amount of the small employer health care tax credit.
Qualifying arrangement
Only premiums paid by the employer under a qualifying arrangement are counted in calculating the credit. Under a qualifying arrangement, the employer pays premiums for each employee enrolled in health care coverage offered by the employer in an amount equal to a uniform percentage (not less than 50 percent) of the premium cost of the coverage. The IRS is developing transition relief for 2010.
Additionally, the amount of an employer's premium payments is capped in relation to the average premium for the small group market. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will determine the average premium for the small group market in a state.
Congress is currently reviewing the costs of premiums. The health care reform package includes a requirement, effective in 2011, that insurance companies spend at least 80 percent of premium revenue on actual health care. Additionally, the health care reform package establishes a process for the annual review of premium increases prior to their use along with public disclosure of how premium rates are determined.
Claiming the credit
Qualified for-profit employers will claim the credit on their annual income tax return. The IRS is expected to advise how tax-exempt employers will claim the credit. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, a qualified small business can choose to start offering health insurance coverage to employees in 2010 and be eligible for the credit. If you are considering providing insurance coverage to your employees, please contact our office. If you have already been paying premiums, don't leave maximizing the new credit to chance; we can help you navigate the many federal rules that come into play.
As always, please contact our office if you have any questions about the new small employer health insurance tax credit.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
In response to the economic downturn that has affected the retirement portfolios of millions of individuals across the country, Congress has been considering a variety of alternatives to offer relief to those who face financial emergencies and need immediate access to their funds. Two of the most significant proposals that have been recommended include: (1) significant broadening of the suspension of the 10 percent penalty tax on early withdrawals from IRAs and defined contribution plans, and (2) extending the temporary suspension of the penalty tax imposed on individuals age 70 ½ or older who do not take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from certain retirement plans.
In response to the economic downturn that has affected the retirement portfolios of millions of individuals across the country, Congress has been considering a variety of alternatives to offer relief to those who face financial emergencies and need immediate access to their funds. Two of the most significant proposals that have been recommended include: (1) significant broadening of the suspension of the 10 percent penalty tax on early withdrawals from IRAs and defined contribution plans, and (2) extending the temporary suspension of the penalty tax imposed on individuals age 70 1/2 or older who do not take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from certain retirement plans.
Early withdrawal penalty
To discourage individuals from using money set aside in retirement accounts for expenses incurred outside of retirement, a 10 percent tax is imposed on the amount that is withdrawn, in addition to this amount being included in the individual's gross income and subject to federal (and often, state) income tax. The 10 percent penalty will not apply to distributions made in the following circumstances:
After the individual has reached age 59 1/2;
The distribution is made to an individual who is a beneficiary of a deceased IRA owner;
The individual is disabled;
For higher education expenses (from IRAs only);
The distributions are made as part of substantially equal payments over the account holder's life expectancy;
The individual retires after age 55;
For unreimbursed medical expenses exceeding 7.5 percent of the individual's adjusted gross income (AGI);
For medical insurance premiums in the case of unemployment;
To buy, build, or rebuild a first home (from IRAs only, and subject to a $10,000 withdrawal limit); and
If the individual is a reservist called to active duty after September 11, 2001.
Caution: The extent to which a withdrawal may be made from an employer-sponsored qualified retirement plan, even with respect to amounts that you contributed, depends upon what is allowed under the written plan itself. Some plans only allow you to withdraw after retirement. Others allow withdrawals for "hardships," which may include medical expenses or other financial crisis. Still other withdrawals, such as withdrawals for higher education or a first home purchase, are never allowed under IRS rules from an employer-sponsored plan.
The 10 percent penalty and, for that matter, the underlying taxable income generated from a withdrawal, do not apply if the funds are properly rolled over within a 60-day period from an employer-sponsored plan to an IRA or from one qualified plan or IRA to another.
Hardship withdrawals. Individuals who take a hardship withdrawal from their defined contribution plan must also pay the 10 percent penalty tax. A hardship is defined as an immediate and heavy financial need. Certain expenses are deemed to meet this definition, but even so, the penalty still applies.
Proposals to suspend the 10 percent penalty
Several proposals have been advanced by policymakers to eliminate or suspend the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty in certain situations. The proposals would generally add a paragraph to Internal Revenue Code Sec. 72(t) to eliminate the penalty in specific circumstances. Proposals include eliminating or suspending the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty for:
Public safety employees who retire before the age of 55;
Workers who are unemployed;
Individuals affected by natural disasters;
Homeowners at risk of having their mortgage foreclosed;
Individuals who receive a hardship distribution from a retirement plan; and
Individuals who have qualified adoption expenses.
RMDs
Individuals with certain qualified retirement plans, as well as traditional IRAs and 403(b) plans, are required to withdraw a certain amount ( a "required minimum distribution" or RMD) from the account each year after reaching age 70 1/2 (Roth IRAs are not subject to the RMD rules). The annual RMD is based on the account balance as of December 31 of the prior year and the account holder's life expectancy. Generally, RMDs must begin no later than April 1 of the year after you reach age 70 1/2.
Proposals to suspend RMDs
RMDs were suspended for 2009 only. RMDs must be taken for 2010 and beyond, unless Congress acts to suspend the RMD rules again. However policymakers have put forth various proposals to eliminate or suspend altogether the RMD requirements. The proposals include:
Suspending the RMD requirement through 2010;
Suspending the RMD requirement through 2012;
Eliminating the RMD requirement; or
Postponing the required starting date, which would raise the age at which individuals must start taking their RMDs.
When contemplating whether to implement any of these proposals, Congress and Treasury officials must balance a number of considerations, including the immediate financial needs of individuals with the policies behind the penalty taxes; namely, providing funds for retirement and not allowing the money to be used for pre-retirement expenses.
Our office will keep you posted on any legislative proposals that may affect your retirement planning. We also can help you navigate the current rules that would apply should you need to make a withdrawal soon from your retirement savings.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
As 2010 unfolds, small businesses are confronted with tax challenges and opportunities on many fronts. Lackluster consumer spending, combined with tight credit, has many small businesses in a holding pattern. Congress may respond with a new tax credit to encourage hiring. Small businesses are also faced with uncertainty over many temporary provisions in the federal Tax Code. Many of these incentives have expired. At the same time, small businesses are uncertain how health care reform, the fate of the federal estate tax and proposed retirement savings initiatives may impact them.
As 2010 unfolds, small businesses are confronted with tax challenges and opportunities on many fronts. Lackluster consumer spending, combined with tight credit, has many small businesses in a holding pattern. Congress may respond with a new tax credit to encourage hiring. Small businesses are also faced with uncertainty over many temporary provisions in the federal Tax Code. Many of these incentives have expired. At the same time, small businesses are uncertain how health care reform, the fate of the federal estate tax and proposed retirement savings initiatives may impact them.
Hiring and retention tax credit
To encourage businesses to hire more workers, the Senate has passed a hiring and retention tax credit (Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act). The credit exempts employers from paying the 6.2 percent Social Security tax for qualified new hires up to the Social Security wage base of $106,800. The new hire must have been unemployed for at least 60 days and added to the employer's payroll before January 1, 2011. Employers would also be eligible for an additional $1,000 tax credit for each new hire that they keep on the payroll for at least 52 consecutive weeks.
The House has not scheduled a vote on the Senate's hiring and retention credit and it is unclear if it will. The House approved a jobs bill late last year (Jobs for Main Street Act, H.R. 2847), which does not include a hiring and retention credit.
Extenders
Businesses may be surprised that some of the tax breaks they took in 2009 are not available in 2010. That's because many of these popular business tax incentives are temporary and they expired at the end of 2009. They include the research tax credit, 15-year recovery periods for qualified leasehold improvement, restaurant, and retail improvement property, enhanced corporate contributions to qualified organizations, special incentives for producers of alternative energy, and others.
In December 2009, the House approved legislation extending these temporary business incentives through December 31, 2010 (Tax Extenders Act of 2009, H.R. 4213). The Senate, however, has yet to act on the House bill or vote on its own version of an extenders package. Traditionally, the extenders have been renewed but this year there is a chance that renewal may be later rather than sooner. High unemployment numbers have Congress focused on job creation. A growing number of lawmakers view many of the extenders as having little if any impact on immediate job creation in the private sector.
Expensing/bonus depreciation
Under a temporary provision expiring at the end of 2009, taxpayers could expense up to $250,000 in annual investment expenditures for qualified property. The maximum amount that could be expensed for property placed in service in 2009 was reduced by the amount that the qualified property exceeded $800,000. The Obama administration has proposed extending enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing, with the $250,000/$800,000 threshold, through December 31, 2010. The Senate approved an extension in its jobs bill and the House approved an extension last year but the chambers have yet to approve the extension in a common bill that they can send to the White House for the president's signature.
Another expired pending incentive is bonus depreciation. Under a temporary provision, an additional first-year depreciation deduction equal to 50 percent of the adjusted basis of the property was provided for qualified property acquired and placed in service before January 1, 2010. The Obama administration has proposed extending bonus depreciation through December 31, 2010. The House approved an extension last year but the Senate has not. There is growing sentiment among some senators that the extension of bonus depreciation into 2010 would be an expensive "budget buster" not worth the price tag.
Health care reform
Health care reform, which dominated the news in recent months, has been on the back burner as lawmakers have switched their attention to jobs. However, health care reform remains a priority of the Obama administration. Some form of a reform package may be enacted in 2010 and it could impose new mandates on employers.
The House health care reform bill (Affordable Health Care for America Act, H.R. 3962) would require employers to satisfy certain minimum coverage requirements. Otherwise, the employer would be liable for an additional payroll tax. Small employers, generally businesses with annual payrolls below $500,000, would be exempt. The Senate health care reform bill (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, H.R. 3590) does not require employers of any size to provide health insurance coverage.
Estate tax
Many small business owners are reviewing their estate plans after the federal estate tax expired January 1, 2010. Effective for decedents dying on and after January 1, 2010 and on or before December 31, 2010 the federal estate tax is replaced with a carryover basis regime. Generally, the income tax basis of property acquired from a decedent is carried over from the decedent. Executors may partially increase the basis of property by up to $1.3 million ($3 million in the case of property passing to a surviving spouse).
The House passed a bill late last year extending the 2009 estate tax into 2010 (Permanent Estate Tax Relief Bill of 2009, H.R. 4154). However, the Senate has not acted on the House bill. Democratic leaders have said the Senate will vote on an extension but have not laid out a timetable. If you have not reviewed your estate plans in light of the expiration of the federal estate tax, please contact our office.
Retirement plans
The Obama administration proposes requiring employers that do not currently offer a retirement plan to offer their employees automatic enrollment in an individual retirement account (IRA). Small businesses (generally employers with 10 or fewer employees) would be exempt from the proposed requirement. The administration's proposal would be effective for tax years beginning after January 1, 2011. Qualified employers would be eligible for a temporary tax credit of $25 for each employee up to a total credit of $250 per year for a maximum of two years.
At the same time, the administration proposes to enhance the existing tax incentive for small employers that establish a retirement plan. Under current law, employers with 100 or fewer employees that adopt a new qualified retirement plan are entitled to a temporary tax credit equal to 50 percent of their expenses to establish and administer the plan. The credit is limited to $500 per year for three years. The administration has asked Congress to double the tax credit to $1,000 per year for three years. The administration's proposal would be effective for tax years beginning after January 1, 2011.
Employment tax audits
In addition to trying to cope with the changing tax laws, small businesses should be aware that the IRS has identified their group as a target for vigorous tax audits. Recent surveys have confirmed for the IRS that the small business environment presents easy opportunities for some "bad apples" to cheat on their taxes. Armed with those statistics as justification, the IRS is now aggressively looking to small businesses to help close "the tax gap," the difference between what taxpayers owe and what is actually collected. One initial area of concern involves employment taxes.
The IRS recently launched a special study of employment tax compliance. The IRS will randomly audit 2,000 taxpayers, including small businesses, each year for the next three years. Employers selected for the study will receive notices from the IRS. According to the IRS, these examinations will be comprehensive, will look at all aspects of employment tax compliance, and will be used to form more effective criteria for auditing many more small businesses.
If you have any questions about the tax opportunities and challenges we have discussed, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Beginning in 2010, the income limitations that have prevented taxpayers with modified adjusted gross incomes of $100,000 or more and married taxpayers that filed their returns separately from converting a traditional individual retirement account (IRA) to a Roth IRA are eliminated entirely. As a bonus to kick off "unlimited Roth conversions," any income tax payments due on 2010 conversions may be deferred into 2011 and 2012. For higher-income individuals, 2010 presents a long-awaited and much anticipated opportunity to convert their savings into a Roth IRA providing tax-free distributions during their retirement years.
Beginning in 2010, the income limitations that have prevented taxpayers with modified adjusted gross incomes of $100,000 or more and married taxpayers that filed their returns separately from converting a traditional individual retirement account (IRA) to a Roth IRA are eliminated entirely. As a bonus to kick off "unlimited Roth conversions," any income tax payments due on 2010 conversions may be deferred into 2011 and 2012. For higher-income individuals, 2010 presents a long-awaited and much anticipated opportunity to convert their savings into a Roth IRA providing tax-free distributions during their retirement years.
Eligibility for a Roth conversion in 2010 does not automatically make it a good decision for every taxpayer. Indeed, under the right circumstances, converting to a Roth IRA can provide potential significant tax and financial benefits. But every individual's needs and circumstances are unique, and a Roth IRA conversion must be assessed in light of your particular tax and financial situation. In addition, converting to a Roth IRA is not a "do-it-yourself" transaction, and you should consult with a tax professional about the benefits and drawbacks relating to your personal situation.
The new conversion opportunity does not apply to funds held in a 401(k). The conversion opportunity applies to traditional IRAs, in addition to SIMPLE IRAs and SEP plans.
Conversion methods
A conversion to a Roth IRA may generally be accomplished by one of three means:
-- Rollover. An IRA rollover involves making an eligible distribution from your traditional IRA that is rolled over into a Roth IRA within 60 days after the distribution. If the rollover does not occur within 60 days, it will be treated as an early withdrawal subject to a 10 percent early withdrawal tax as well as federal (and possible state) income taxation.
-- Trustee-to-trustee transfer. If your IRA trustee is the same trustee for your traditional IRA and Roth IRA, you may have that trustee make the account transfer on your behalf. Additionally, if the trustee is not the same, your traditional IRA trustee can also transfer the funds to your new, Roth IRA trustee on your behalf, even if they are not the same trustee for the accounts.
-- Account redesignation.
Regardless of type of means you use to convert to a Roth IRA, amounts converted from a non-Roth IRA to a Roth IRA are treated as distributed from the non-Roth IRA and rolled over to the Roth IRA. As mentioned above, a rollover must generally be effectuated within 60 days.
Income tax consequences
The government is encouraging Roth conversions not only to shore up retirement savings but also to gain short time revenues. It accomplishes the latter because a conversion from a traditional IRA is counted as a taxable distribution in which income taxes must be paid. Unlike such distributions outside of a Roth conversion, however, no early withdrawal penalty is imposed. Since you would be taxed on your traditional IRA distributions eventually anyway upon retirement, having the distribution taxed at the time of a Roth conversion can be viewed as an acceleration of that tax. In return, however, the funds that become part of your Roth account, including future earnings of them, become tax free forever into the future.
For conversions taking place in 2010, you have the option to elect to recognize the taxable income generated on the conversion amount ratably in adjusted gross income (AGI) in 2011 and 2012, instead of recognizing it all in 2010. This election does not spread the tax that would otherwise be paid in 2010 to 2011 and 2012; rather, it spreads the income realized in 2010, half into 2011 and half into 2012. That income, half in 2011 and half in 2012, is taxed at 2011 and 2012 rates, respectively, along with any other income normally realized for those years. It is important to "do the math" on this election before making any decision.
Conversion transaction
The institution or brokerage at which you maintain your traditional IRA will generally have a Roth Conversion Form, or similar document, that you must fill out to complete the transaction. The form may ask you for the name and account number of the IRA that you want to convert, whether you want to convert the entire amount of the traditional IRA, or only a part of the account, and the amount of the IRA you want to convert to the Roth IRA (or number of shares). Typically, the form will also inform your federal and state income tax withholding obligations regarding the transaction. You will have the opportunity to elect withholding, or elect not to have anything withheld from the funds in order to meet your anticipated income tax obligations from the transaction.
Note. Whether you pay the taxes on the transaction from the funds transferred to the Roth IRA itself, or with outside funds, is an important decision you make. In general, taxpayers are better off paying the tax, if they can, with funds outside the account. You should discuss the taxation aspect of the conversion with your tax advisor.
If you have any questions about converting your traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, please contact our office. We can help determine if converting your account is the best decision considering your financial and tax situation and needs, and help you with the transaction.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 allows employers to claim a credit against certain employment taxes for providing COBRA premium assistance to eligible individuals, including former employees who were involuntarily terminated from employment any time during the period beginning on September 1, 2008, and ending on December 31, 2009. The 2010 defense bill extends eligibility for COBRA premium assistance through February 28, 2010. The 2010 defense bill also extends the maximum duration of COBRA premium assistance to 15 months and provides an election to pay premiums retroactively and maintain COBRA coverage.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 allows employers to claim a credit against certain employment taxes for providing COBRA premium assistance to eligible individuals, including former employees who were involuntarily terminated from employment any time during the period beginning on September 1, 2008, and ending on December 31, 2009. The 2010 defense bill extends eligibility for COBRA premium assistance through February 28, 2010. The 2010 defense bill also extends the maximum duration of COBRA premium assistance to 15 months and provides an election to pay premiums retroactively and maintain COBRA coverage.
As an employer, you may recover the 65 percent of the subsidy provided to assistance-eligible individuals by taking the subsidy amount as a credit on your quarterly employment tax return, Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return.
You may provide the subsidy and thereafter claim the credit on your employment tax return only after you have received the 35 percent premium payment from eligible former employees and other "assistance eligible individuals." The credit is treated as a deposit made on the first day of the return period (quarter or year).
Notice: The Jobs for Main Street Bill of 2010 (H.R. 2847), would extend COBRA premium assistance through June 30, 2010 and make other enhancements. The House approved the Jobs for Main Street Bill on December 17; the Senate is set to consider it when it returns in January.
Claiming the credit on Form 941
You must treat the 35 percent payment by eligible former employees as full payment, but you are entitled to a credit for the other 65 percent of the COBRA cost on your payroll tax return. The credit is taken on line 12a of Form 941, line 11a of Form 944, or line 13a of Form 943 once the 35 percent of the premium is paid by or on behalf of an assistance eligible individual. The credit is treated as a deposit made on the first day of the return period (quarter or year).
Note. In the case of a multiemployer plan, the credit is claimed by the plan, not the employer. In the case of an insured plan subject to state law continuation coverage requirements, the credit is claimed by the insurance company, not the employer.
An "assistance eligible individual" is a qualified beneficiary of an employer's group health plan who is eligible for COBRA continuation coverage during the period beginning September 1, 2008, and ending December 31, 2009, due to the involuntarily termination from employment of a covered employee during the period and elects continuation COBRA coverage. The assistance for the coverage can last up to nine months. Assistance eligible individuals can include former employees, their spouses, and dependents.
Supporting documentation
You must maintain supporting documentation for the credit claimed. This includes:
-- Documentation of receipt of the employee's 35 percent share of the premium, including dates and amounts;
-- In the case of insured plans, a copy of invoice or other supporting statement from the insurance carrier and proof of timely payment of the full premium to the insurance carrier; and
-- Declaration or attestation of the former employee's involuntary termination, including date of the involuntary termination for each covered employee whose involuntary termination is the basis for eligibility for the subsidy;
-- In the case of a self-insured plan, proof of the premium amount and proof of the coverage provided to the assistance eligible individuals. Attestation of involuntary termination;
-- Proof of each assistance eligible individual's eligibility for COBRA coverage and the election of COBRA; and
-- A record of the Social Security Numbers (SSNs) of all covered employees, the amount of the subsidy reimbursed with regard to each covered employee, and whether the subsidy was for one individual or two or more individuals.
For more information on claiming the credit, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) extended the 50-percent additional first-year bonus depreciation allowed under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, providing a generous boost for many businesses in 2009 in light of the economic downturn. Under the 2009 Recovery Act, all businesses, large or small, can immediately depreciate an additional 50-percent of the cost of certain qualifying property purchased and placed in service in 2009, from computer software to plants and equipment.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) extended the 50-percent additional first-year bonus depreciation allowed under the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, providing a generous boost for many businesses in 2009 in light of the economic downturn. Under the 2009 Recovery Act, all businesses, large or small, can immediately depreciate an additional 50-percent of the cost of certain qualifying property purchased and placed in service in 2009, from computer software to plants and equipment. Moreover, the 50-percent bonus depreciation allowance can be taken together with any Code Sec. 179 expensing, which was also extended through 2009.
Bonus basics
The 2009 Recovery Act (just as with the 2008 Stimulus Act) allows all businesses to take a bonus first-year depreciation deduction of 50-percent of the adjusted basis of qualified property purchased and placed in service for use in your trade or business after December 1, 2009, and generally before January 1, 2010. Bonus depreciation is allowed only for: (1) tangible property to which MACRS applies that has an applicable recovery period of 20 years or less, (2) water utility property, (3) certain computer software, and (4) qualified leasehold improvement property. It is not allowed for intangible property, with the exception of certain computer software.
Bonus depreciation can be claimed for both regular and alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability. It is also important to note that, since bonus depreciation is treated as a depreciation deduction, it is subject to recapture as ordinary income under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. And if you have a tax year that is less than 12 months, the amount of the bonus depreciation allowance is not affected by a short tax year.
Computing your bonus depreciation
To figure your allowable 50-percent bonus depreciation deduction, you must multiple the unadjusted depreciable basis of the property by 50 percent. This is the amount of additional first-year depreciation you can deduct in 2009. For example, you purchase qualifying property for your business in 2009 that costs $150,000. You are allowed an additional first-year depreciation deduction of $75,000.
Note. The "unadjusted depreciable basis" is the property's cost (including amounts you paid in case, debt obligations, or other property or services, plus any amounts you paid for items such as sales tax, freight charges, installation, or testing fees).
Regular depreciation. After you have computed the 50-percent bonus depreciation allowance for the property, you can use the remaining cost to compute your regular MACRS depreciation for 2009 and subsequent years. Under MACRS, the cost or other basis of an asset is generally recovered over a specific recovery period. In this case, the property must have a recovery period of 20 years or less.
Example. Assume that in 2009 a taxpayer purchases new depreciable property and places it in service. The property's cost is $1,000 and it is 5-year property subject to the half-year convention. The amount of additional first-year depreciation allowed under the provision is $500. The remaining $500 of the cost of the property is deductible under the rules applicable to 5-year property. Thus, 20 percent, or $100, is apportioned to 2009, which computes to an additional $50 regular depreciation deduction in 2009 under the half-year convention. Accordingly, the total depreciation deduction with respect to the property for 2009 is $550. The remaining $450 cost of the property is recovered under otherwise applicable rules for computing depreciation in subsequent years.
Code Sec. 179 expensing. The 50-percent bonus depreciation allowance is taken after any Code Sec. 179 expense deduction and before you compute regular depreciation under MACRS rules. Therefore, the cost (basis) of the property must be reduced by the amount of any Code Sec. 179 expense allowance claimed on the property before computing the 50-percent bonus depreciation allowance (multiplying the property's basis by 50-percent). Regular depreciation under MACRS is then computed after you have reduced the basis by any Code Sec. 179 expensing allowance and the 50-percent bonus depreciation allowance.
Example. On April 14, 2009, Tom bought and placed in service in his business qualified tangible property that cost $1 million. He did not elect to claim the Code Sec. 179 expensing deduction and he claims no other credits or deductions related to the property. He may deduct 50-percent of the cost ($500,000) for purposes of the 2009 special bonus depreciation. He will use the remaining $500,000 of the property's cost to figure his regular MACRS depreciation deduction for 2009 and the years thereafter.
Example. The facts are the same as above, except Tom uses the Code Sec. 179 expensing deduction. On April 14, 2009, Tom bought and placed in service in his business qualified tangible property that cost $750,000. He elects to deduct $250,000 of the property's cost as a Code Sec. 179 deduction. Tom will apply the 50-percent bonus depreciation allowance to $500,000 ($750,000 - $250,000), which is the cost of the property after subtracting the section 179 expensing deduction. Tom will then deduct 50-percent of the cost after section 179 expensing ($250,000) for purposes of the 2009 special bonus depreciation. He will use the remaining $250,000 of the property's cost to figure his regular MACRS depreciation deduction for 2009 and the years thereafter.
Computing bonus depreciation can be a complicated process, as many variables may come into play. Our tax professionals can help determine the best way for your business to utilize the new bonus depreciation allowance together with other tax incentives to achieve significant tax savings.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
If you've made, or are planning to make, a big gift before the end of 2009, you may be wondering what your gift tax liability, if any, may be. You may have to file a federal tax return even if you do not owe any gift tax. Read on to learn more about when to file a federal gift tax return.
If you've made, or are planning to make, a big gift before the end of 2009, you may be wondering what your gift tax liability, if any, may be. You may have to file a federal tax return even if you do not owe any gift tax. Read on to learn more about when to file a federal gift tax return.
When you must file
Most gifts you make are not subject to the gift tax. Generally, you must file a gift tax return, Form 709, U.S. Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, if any of the following apply to gifts you have made, or will make, in 2009:
Gifts you give to another person (other than your spouse) exceed the $13,000 annual gift tax exclusion for 2009.
You and your spouse are splitting a gift.
You gave someone (other than your spouse) a gift of a future interest that he or she cannot actually possess, enjoy or receive income from until some time in the future.
Remember, filing a gift tax return does not necessarily mean you will owe gift tax.
Gifts that do not require a tax return
You do not have to file a gift tax return to report three types of gifts: (1) transfers to political organizations, (2) gift payments that qualify for the educational exclusion, or (3) gift payments that qualify for the medical payment exclusion. Although medical expenses and tuition paid for another person are considered gifts for federal gift tax purposes, if you make the gift directly to the medical or educational institution, the payment will be non-taxable. This applies to any amount you directly transfer to the provider as long as the payments go directly to them, not to the person on whose behalf the gift is made.
Unified credit
Even if the gift tax applies to your gifts, it may be completely eliminated by the unified credit, also referred to as the applicable credit amount, which can eliminate or reduce your gift (as well as estate) taxes. You must subtract the unified credit from any gift tax you owe; any unified credit you use against your gift tax in one year will reduce the amount of the credit you can apply against your gift tax liability in a later year. Keep in mind that the total credit amount that you use against your gift tax liability during your life reduces the credit available to use against your estate tax.
Let's take a look at an example:
In 2009, you give your nephew Ben a cash gift of $8,000. You also pay the $20,000 college tuition of your friend, Sam. You give your 30-year-old daughter, Mary, $25,000. You also give your 27-year-old son, Michael, $25,000. Before 2009, you had never given a taxable gift. You apply the exceptions to the gift tax and the unified credit as follows:
The qualified education tuition exclusion applies to the gift to Sam, as payment of tuition expenses is not subject to the gift tax. Therefore, the gift to Sam is not a taxable gift.
The 2009 annual exclusion applies to the first $13,000 of your gift to Ben, Mary and Michael, since the first $13,000 of your gift to any one individual in 2009 is not taxable. Therefore, your $8,000 gift to Ben, the first $13,000 of your gift to Mary, and the first $13,000 of your gift to Michael are not taxable gifts.
Finally, apply the unified credit. The gift tax will apply to $24,000 of the above transfers ($12,000 remaining from your gift to Mary, plus $12,000 remaining from your gift to Michael). The amount of the tax on the $24,000 is computed using IRS tables for computing the gift tax, which is located in the Instructions for Form 709. You would subtract the tax owe on these gifts from your unified credit of $345,800 for 2009. The unified credit that you can use against the gift tax in a later year (and against any estate tax) will thus be reduced. If you apply the unified credit to the amount of gift tax owe in 2009, you may not have to pay any gift tax for the year. Nevertheless, you will have to file a Form 709.
Filing a gift tax return
You must report the amount of a taxable gift on Form 709. For gifts made in 2009, the maximum gift tax rate is 45 percent. You can make an unlimited number of tax-free gifts in 2009, as long as the gifts are not more than $13,000 to each person or entity in 2009 (or $26,000 if you and your spouse make a gift jointly), without having to pay gift taxes on the transfers.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
A financially secure employee is a productive one. Employee benefits play a key role in attracting and retaining employees. Financial counseling, tax preparation and retirement planning services are increasingly popular benefits offered by employers to their employees. However, not all of these result in a tax-free perk to employees. If you are considering offering your employees financial, tax or retirement planning services, you need to understand the tax consequences to both you and your workforce.
A financially secure employee is a productive one. Employee benefits play a key role in attracting and retaining employees. Financial counseling, tax preparation and retirement planning services are increasingly popular benefits offered by employers to their employees. However, not all of these result in a tax-free perk to employees. If you are considering offering your employees financial, tax or retirement planning services, you need to understand the tax consequences to both you and your workforce.
Financial counseling and tax preparation services
Generally, the fair market value of fringe benefits is included in the recipient's gross income unless specifically excluded.There are no specific exceptions under the Internal Revenue Code that exclude financial counseling and tax preparation services from tax. However, some financial counseling and tax preparation services, depending on what type of service is offered and how frequently the service is offered, might be excluded from employees' gross incomes. The IRS has ruled that employer sponsorship of a Volunteer Income Tax Assistance site is a de minimis fringe benefit as is formatting and transmitting employees' returns to qualify for the IRS's e-File program. However, employer-provided vouchers for income tax preparation services are not a de minimis fringe benefit. The IRS's guidance in this area is complicated. We'll help you navigate the complex rules.
Retirement planning services
If you maintain a qualified retirement plan, qualified employer-provided retirement planning services are not taxable as income to your employees. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 added employer-provided qualified retirement planning services as a new type of fringe benefit that is specifically excluded by law from employees' taxable income. The cost of these services is deductible by the employer as a business expense. For purposes of the fringe benefit, a qualified employer plan may be, but is not limited to, a pension, profit-sharing and stock bonus plans, certain annuity plans and annuity contracts, federal and state government employee plans, and certain simplified employee pensions and SIMPLE retirement accounts.
The Internal Revenue Code broadly defines "qualified retirement planning services" as "any retirement planning advice or information provided to an employee and his spouse by an employer maintaining a qualified employer plan." However, Congress specifically excluded certain services related to retirement planning, which are tax preparation, accounting, legal, and brokerage services.
If you would like more information about providing retirement, financial or tax planning services as a benefit to your employees, please call our office. We would be happy to help you design a program tailored to your employees.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Falling interest rates and the current slowdown in the U.S. economy are having a widespread affect on today's economy and individuals' financial resources, from savings accounts to personal loans and credit card debt. The drop in interest rates that has occurred over the course of the last few months has also produced strategic tax planning opportunities for individuals contemplating certain types of asset transfers.
Falling interest rates and the current slowdown in the U.S. economy are having a widespread affect on today's economy and individuals' financial resources, from savings accounts to personal loans and credit card debt. The drop in interest rates that has occurred over the course of the last few months has also produced strategic tax planning opportunities for individuals contemplating certain types of asset transfers.
Lower interest rates affect the income, estate and gift tax consequences of making certain asset transfers and utilizing various estate planning tools, reducing or eliminating altogether transfer tax costs. On the other hand, low interest rates make some types of transfers and tax planning techniques unappealing. Here are some examples.
Private annuity arrangements
Private annuities, like life estates, term interests, remainders, and reversions are valued for estate, gift and tax purposes using actuarial tables issued under Code Sec. 7520 by the IRS. The applicable interest rate, which the IRS calls the "Applicable Federal Rate" (or AFR), fluctuates based on current market interest rates and is published on a monthly basis by the IRS. For example, the Code Sec. 7520 interest rate for March 2008 was 3.6 percent. The interest rate hit a historical low of 3 percent in July 2003, and has been as high as 11.6 percent.
In a typical private annuity arrangement, a parent transfers assets to his or her child or children in exchange for the transferee's promise to pay a fixed, periodic income payment for the parent's life. To escape gift tax, the value of the annuity payments is based on the IRS's published interest rates and life expectancy schedules. If the fair market value of the assets that are transferred under the arrangement equal the value given to the annuity under the IRS's valuation tables, no gift tax will result from the transaction. The lower the interest rates when the private annuity arrangement is entered into, the lower the annual annuity payments that will have to be made to the parent, resulting in lower, or no, gift tax costs.
Grantor retained annuity trust
A grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT) is an attractive estate-planning tool, especially when interest rates are low. A GRAT is an irrevocable trust in which the grantor transfers assets to the trust but retains the right to receive fixed annuity payments for a specified period of years. When the trust's term expires, the trust terminates and the remaining trust assets are distributed to non-charitable beneficiaries, such as the grantor's children.
The value of the remainder interest in a GRAT is determined according to the IRS's Code Sec. 7520 interest rate; the assumption is that the assets placed in the trust will appreciate at this rate. Therefore, the lower the interest rate in the month that a GRAT is set up, the lower the value of the remainder interest in the trust and therefore the less in gift tax will be paid. A GRAT is especially useful for transferring income-producing assets or property expected to increase in value over the course of the years because all future appreciation not only is removed from the grantor's estate, but appreciation that exceeds the Code Sec. 7520 interest rate passes free of gift tax to the beneficiaries.
Charitable lead annuity trust
A charitable lead annuity trust (CLAT) is like a GRAT, except that the annuity payments are distributed to charities, not the grantor, with the remainder passing to noncharitable beneficiaries, such as children. Gift tax is not due on the value of the charitable interest. A low interest rate in the month that the CLAT is established creates two important benefits: an increase in the present value of the charity's lead interest, which translates into a larger charitable income tax deduction and a lower gift tax on the remainder interest that passes to family members.
Charitable remainder interests in a personal residence
Lower interest rates also produce tax savings for individuals who transfer a remainder interest in their home, but retain a life interest in the property. The individual takes an income tax deduction for the gift of the remainder interest in the home that passes to the charitable organization. As interest rates decrease, the value of the remainder interest and, thus, the charitable deduction increases.
Importantly, low interest rates are not always beneficial in tax planning. Although there are tax benefits to the following planning tools, lower interest rates make these tax planning "techniques" unattractive:
Grantor retained income trusts
A grantor retained income trust (GRIT) operates like a GRAT, except that the grantor retains an income interest in the trust for a specified period instead of an annuity interest. A decrease in interest rates operates to reduce the value of the grantor's retained income interest, thereby increasing the value of the remainder interest to the beneficiaries, and thus increasing the gift tax.
Charitable remainder annuity trusts
A charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) also operates like a GRAT except that the remainder interest in the trust passes to one or more charitable beneficiaries, as opposed to family members. The grantor takes a current income tax deduction for the present value of the charity's remainder interest, therefore the grantor wants the trust's remainder interest to be as large as possible so that he or she can maximize the deduction. The lower the interest rate when the CRAT is established, the lower the value of the remainder interest that passes to charity, and therefore the lower the charitable tax deduction.
Charitable remainder unitrusts
A CRUT is similar to a CRAT - but the grantor receives a fixed percent of the trust's value each year, with the remainder interest passing to charity. And like a CRAT, a change in interest rates will not generally affect the size of the income tax deductions or the gift taxes associated with charitable remainder unitrusts (CRUTs). For example, the value of the charitable interest is calculated based on today's values, and thus a lower interest rate will result in a lower value of the charitable interest and thus a lower current tax deduction.
Qualified personal residence trust
A qualified personal residence trust (QPRT) is similar to a GRAT, except the grantor retains the right to live in the home, instead of receiving annuity payments, with the remainder interest passing to his or her beneficiaries. The lower the interest rate, the larger the remainder interest subject to gift tax, and therefore the larger the transfer tax.
If you would like to talk about the tax benefits and consequences of these or other tax planning tools, please call our office. We would be glad to discuss how these and other strategies fit in to your personal financial and tax situation.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The business incentives in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) are much anticipated and valuable. Three significant business incentives in the 2009 Recovery Act are an extended net operating loss (NOL) carryback provision, extended and enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing, and extended bonus depreciation for 2009.
The business incentives in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) are much anticipated and valuable. Three significant business incentives in the 2009 Recovery Act are an extended net operating loss (NOL) carryback provision, extended and enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing, and extended bonus depreciation for 2009.
Expensing. The 2009 Recovery Act extends the Code Sec. 179 expensing amount of $250,000 through 2009 (the 2008 Economic Stimulus Act had raised expensing to this limit). Additionally, the threshold for reducing the deduction continues to be $800,000. This is the phase-out threshold for when your business's investment in other eligible property hits certain levels.
Enhanced expensing can be very valuable if you plan correctly. Many businesses apply expensing to the asset with the longest write-off period, and apply other expensing or depreciation to assets with shorter recovery periods, to maximize the write-offs. However, every business is different and there is no "one-size- fits-all" expensing rule. We can help you maximize your tax savings based on your situation.
You also need to take into account how your business is structured. The phase-out threshold applies to the taxpayer as a whole, not separately to each trade or business of the taxpayer. As a result, owners of pass-through entities, such as S corporations and partnerships, could quickly reach the phase-out level when all Schedule K-1s are added together.
Another consideration is any unused expense deduction carryovers. The Code Sec. 179 limit for the year is increased by any unused expense deduction carryovers. This increased amount is subject to the limits on the annual deduction ceiling, the investment ceiling and the taxable income from one or more active trades or businesses. Carryovers from these limits can be carried forward to later years.
Bonus depreciation. The 2009 Recovery Act continues to give taxpayers additional 50 percent first-year bonus depreciation for qualifying property through December 31, 2009. But, through 2010, the 2009 Recovery Act extends the additional first year of bonus depreciation for property with a recovery period of 10 years or longer, for transportation property (tangible personal property used to transport people or property), and aircraft.
Note. Keep in mind that not all types of property qualify for bonus depreciation. Bonus depreciation is available for every item of tangible personal property except inventory. It is not available for intangibles, except for certain computer software. Bonus depreciation cannot be taken for tangible personal property used outside the U.S. or for property depreciated under the alternative depreciation system.
"Original use" and "placed in service" requirements remain effective. Original use of the property must commence with the taxpayer after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 20101. This means that you must have purchased new property or manufactured, constructed or produced the property during 2009 or acquired it under a binding written contract entered into during 2009. The property must not have been the subject of a binding written contract for its acquisition that was in effect before 2009.
You generally must place the property in service during 2009. However, the placed-in-service date is extended through 2010, as previously discussed, for some transportation and other property.
Higher caps on vehicle depreciation.The 2009 Recovery Act also extended the regular dollar caps for new vehicles placed in service in 2009, raising the caps again by $8,000, effective January 1, 2009. The increase mirrors the 2008 temporary dollar cap increases. For 2008, the regular first-year depreciation dollar cap was raised to $10,960 for automobiles ($11,160 for light trucks and vans) if bonus depreciation was elected.
Sold or converted property. The rules are complex when property is sold or converted from personal to business use and vice versa. If the property is sold in the same year it is placed in service, no bonus depreciation is allowed. If property is acquired for personal use and converted to business use in the same year, bonus depreciation can be taken. However, if property is purchased for business use and converted to personal use in the same year, no bonus depreciation is allowed.
If you have any questions about the economic stimulus payments or how your business can benefit from enhanced expensing or bonus depreciation, give us a call or drop us an email. We can schedule a time to sit down and discuss these and any other questions you might have in more detail.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Like the Internet itself, the correct deductibility of a business's website development costs is still in its formative stages. What is fairly clear, however, is that it is highly unlikely that any single tax treatment will apply to all of the costs incurred in designing an internet site because the process encompasses many different types of expenses.
Like the Internet itself, the correct deductibility of a business's website development costs is still in its formative stages. What is fairly clear, however, is that it is highly unlikely that any single tax treatment will apply to all of the costs incurred in designing an internet site because the process encompasses many different types of expenses.
Figuring out how to treat website costs is not a simple matter of treating all website design costs as current advertising expenses. Instead, based on the IRS response so far to taxpayers in similar situations, business owners should be prepared to separate their costs into three appropriate tax categories: planning, construction and content.
Planning
Before developing a website, the taxpayer must decide whether it needs an internet presence and, if so, how its website should operate. If the website will expand the taxpayer's current operations, expenses incurred as part of this decision-making process should be currently deductible as costs related to the expansion of an existing business. Other planning costs, however, may benefit the business for at least several years and, as such, may be required to be capitalized and deducted over that period.
Construction
Construction costs are those related to getting a website up and running. Many website construction costs will involve the acquisition of computer hardware and associated software. Other construction costs include those related to a domain name to serve as the website's address on the internet and employee training. Each component has its own strict capitalization and depreciation rules that must be followed.
Content
Every website contains content consisting of text, digitized photographs, artwork, video, and/or audio. While content is part of a website, content files are generally separate from the website's software; they are data files, not software, that reside on and are called up from the web server. Unlike the elements of website construction, content can be easily removed or changed without affecting the basic architecture of the site.
Material for a website may be purchased or licensed from third parties, or it may be created by the taxpayer. Some content consists of advertising, particularly in catalog or banner ad formats. Other content may be noncommercial. Most good websites are continually updated to reflect new information. Few of these updates will have a useful life of more than one year; thus, the cost of providing them should be a currently deductible business expense.
If you are thinking of launching a website for your business or have plans to expand a website that you already have up and running, structuring your related expenses with the tax laws in mind might help offset some of the costs. Please contact this office if you have any questions.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
On December 18, 2007, Congress passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (Mortgage Debt Relief Act), providing some major assistance to certain homeowners struggling to make their mortgage payments. The centerpiece of the new law is a three-year exception to the long-standing rule under the Tax Code that mortgage debt forgiven by a lender constitutes taxable income to the borrower. However, the new law does not alleviate all the pain of all troubled homeowners but, in conjunction with a mortgage relief plan recently announced by the Treasury Department, the Act provides assistance to many subprime borrowers.
On December 18, 2007, Congress passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (Mortgage Debt Relief Act), providing some major assistance to certain homeowners struggling to make their mortgage payments. The centerpiece of the new law is a three-year exception to the long-standing rule under the Tax Code that mortgage debt forgiven by a lender constitutes taxable income to the borrower. However, the new law does not alleviate all the pain of all troubled homeowners but, in conjunction with a mortgage relief plan recently announced by the Treasury Department, the Act provides assistance to many subprime borrowers.
Cancellation of debt income
When a lender forecloses on property, sells the home for less than the borrower's outstanding mortgage debt and forgives all, or part, of the unpaid debt, the Tax Code generally treats the forgiven portion of the mortgage debt as taxable income to the homeowner. This is regarded as "cancellation of debt income" (reported on a Form 1099) and taxed to the borrower at ordinary income tax rates.
Example. Mary's principal residence is subject to a $250,000 mortgage debt. Her lender forecloses on the property in 2008. Her home is sold for $200,000 due to declining real estate values. The lender forgives the $50,000 difference leaving Mary with $50,000 in discharge of indebtedness income. Without the new exclusion in the Mortgage Debt Relief Act, Mary would have to pay income taxes on the $50,000 cancelled debt income.
The Mortgage Debt Relief Act
The Mortgage Debt Relief Act excludes from taxation discharges of up to $2 million of indebtedness that is secured by a principal residence and was incurred to acquire, build or make substantial improvements to the taxpayer's principal residence. While the determination of a taxpayer's principal residence is to be based on consideration of "all the facts and circumstances," it is generally the one in which the taxpayer lives most of the time. Therefore, vacation homes and second homes are generally excluded.
Moreover, the debt must be secured by, and used for, the principal residence. Home equity indebtedness is not covered by the new law unless it was used to make improvements to the home. "Cash out" refinancing, popular during the recent real estate boom, in which the funds were not put back into the home but were instead used to pay off credit card debt, tuition, medical expenses, or make other expenditures, is not covered by the new law. Such debt is fully taxable income unless other exceptions apply, such as bankruptcy or insolvency. Additionally, "acquisition indebtedness" includes refinancing debt to the extent the amount of the refinancing does not exceed the amount of the refinanced debt.
The Mortgage Debt Relief Act is effective for debt that has been discharged on or after January 1, 2007, and before January 1, 2010.
Mortgage workouts
In addition to foreclosure situations, some taxpayers renegotiating the terms of their mortgage with their lender are also covered by the new law. A typical foreclosure nets a lender only about 60 cents on the dollar. When the lender determines that foreclosure is not in its best interests, it may offer a mortgage workout. Generally, in a mortgage workout the terms of the mortgage are modified to result in a lower monthly payment and thus make the loan more affordable.
More help
Recently, Treasury Department officials brokered a plan that brings together private sector mortgage lenders, banks, and the Bush Administration to help homeowners. The plan is called HOPE NOW.
Here's how it works: The HOPE NOW plan is aimed at helping borrowers who were able to afford the introductory "teaser" rates on their adjustable rate mortgage (ARM), but will not be able to afford the loan once the rate resets between 2008 and 2010 (approximately 1.3 million ARMs are expected to reset during this period). The plan will "freeze" these borrowers' interest rates for a period of five years. The plan, however, has some limitations that exclude many borrowers. Only borrowers who are current on their mortgage payments will benefit. Borrowers already in default or who have not remained current on their mortgage payments are excluded.
Under the HOPE NOW plan, borrowers may be able t
- Refinance to a new mortgage;
- Switch to a loan insured by the Federal Housing Authority (FHA);
- Freeze their "teaser" introductory rate for five years.
Without the Mortgage Debt Relief Act, a homeowner who modifies the terms of their mortgage loan, or has their interest rate frozen for a period of time, could be subject to debt forgiveness income under the Tax Code. This is why the provision of the Mortgage Debt Relief Act excluding debt forgiveness income from a borrower's income is a critical component necessary to make the HOPE NOW plan effective.
If you would like to know more about relief under the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 and the Treasury Department's plan, please call our office. We are happy to help you navigate these complicated issues.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Long-term care premiums are deductible up to certain amounts as itemized medical expense deductions. The amount is based upon your age. Unfortunately, most taxpayers do not have enough other medical expense deductions to exceed the non-deductible portion equal to the first 7 ½ percent of adjusted gross income (10 percent if you are subject to alternative minimum tax (AMT)). Furthermore, more taxpayers now take the standard deduction rather than itemize, making even those medical expenses useless as a tax deduction.
Long-term care premiums are deductible up to certain amounts as itemized medical expense deductions. The amount is based upon your age. Unfortunately, most taxpayers do not have enough other medical expense deductions to exceed the non-deductible portion equal to the first 7 1/2 percent of adjusted gross income (10 percent if you are subject to alternative minimum tax (AMT)). Furthermore, more taxpayers now take the standard deduction rather than itemize, making even those medical expenses useless as a tax deduction.
A tax bill has been before Congress for several years now to allow long-term care premiums to be deductible "above the line," that is, by anyone irrespective of whether you itemize. The impetus behind this recommendation is that encouraging individuals to fund their own eventual eldercare is preferable to having federal Medicare payments to so. So far, however, Congress has not brought the matter to a vote. Some state income tax laws already allow such an above-the-line deduction.
Long-term care premiums. Long-term care insurance premiums are deductible in figuring itemized medical expense deductions up to the following amounts:
- Age 40 or younger: $290 in 2007; $310 in 2008;
- Over 40 but not older than 50: $550 in 2007; $580 in 2008;
- Over 50 but not older than 60: $1,110 in 2007; $1,150 in 2008;
- Over 60 but not older than 70: $2,950 in 2007; $3,080 in 2008; and
- Over 70: $3,680 in 2007; $3,850 in 2008.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Q: After what period is my federal tax return safe from audit? A: Generally, the time-frame within which the IRS can examine a federal tax return you have filed is three years. To be more specific, Code Sec. 6501 states that the IRS has three years from the later of the deadline for filing the return (usually April 15th for individuals) or the date you actually filed the return. This means that if you file your return on May 10, 2009, the IRS will have until May 10, 2012 to look at it and "assess a deficiency;" not April 17, 2012.
Q: After what period is my federal tax return safe from audit?
A: Generally, the time-frame within which the IRS can examine a federal tax return you have filed is three years. To be more specific, Code Sec. 6501 states that the IRS has three years from the later of the deadline for filing the return (usually April 15th for individuals) or the date you actually filed the return. This means that if you file your return on May 10, 2009, the IRS will have until May 10, 2012 to look at it and "assess a deficiency;" not April 17, 2012.
There are exceptions and caveats to this general principle, however. If you file prior to April 15, the IRS still has until April 15 of the third year that follows to audit your return. This means that if you filed an income tax return on February 10, 2009, you still won't be out-of-the-woods until April 15, 2012. For taxpayers who file fraudulent returns, incorrect returns with the intent to evade tax, and those who do not file at all, the IRS may open an audit at any time.
(Don't confuse the deadline for IRS tax assessments with your right to file a refund claim for an amount that you overpaid, either on a filed return or through withholding or estimated tax payments. That deadline is the later of three years from the filing deadline or two years from your last tax payment.)
You may also find some comfort in the practical IRS audit-cycle rhythm. While you are never truly beyond an audit until the statute of limitations has properly run, there are some general standards to keep in mind. Office audits are usually done within 1 1/2 years of the time the return was filed, and field office audits are complete by 2 1/2 years. The rule of thumb is that if you haven't been contacted within this time frame, you're probably not going to be. Especially for small businesses, the IRS has promised to shorten its normal audit cycle so that those taxpayers are not "left hanging" on potential tax liabilities (with interest and penalties) until the three-year limitations period has expired. Whether this shortened period happens, however, is still open to speculation. Most businesses should continue to make it a practice to keep "tax reserves" to cover such audit liabilities.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
One of the easiest ways for a business to limit liability is to use independent contractors instead of employees. Of course, merely calling employees "independent contractors" will not make those individuals independent contractors.
One of the easiest ways for a business to limit liability is to use independent contractors instead of employees. Of course, merely calling employees "independent contractors" will not make those individuals independent contractors.
Control
The determination of whether a worker will be considered a contractor or an employee is a question of control. If the worker determines his or her own fees (usually per job), sets his or her own working hours, and provides his or her own tools, he can reasonably be considered an independent contractor. If the worker does not control his or her hours worked or wages, and uses tools provided for him or her by the employer, the worker is probably an employee.
There is a 20-factor common law test that can help determine if a worker is an independent contractor. It is important to work through the factors to determine the correct classification for the worker has been chosen, as the classifications have distinct consequences.
Benefits
The difference between independent contractors and employees is stark, and is not simply limited to the label of the worker.
Independent contractors need not be included in retirement plans. You will only have to pay the contractor gross pay, rather than withholding wages for tax purposes. As you need not pay Social Security, Medicare or unemployment insurance for an independent contractor, record keeping is much simpler.
Independent contractors are also responsible for their own tort and contract liability. If an independent contractor commits a tort, in most cases the contractor will be solely liable.
Proceed with caution
Use extreme caution when labeling workers. Mislabeling workers can lead to serious problems.
You could be responsible for back employment taxes, which are often considerable when interest and penalties attach. You could also be liable for damages in a tort claim decided against the mislabeled worker.
Tort liability for a mislabeled worker can have repercussions beyond the payment of the damages. If the worker is deemed to be an employee, the use of contractors instead of employees for liability limitation is lost, which can impact whether the business was operated in such a manner as to limit liability on the whole.
Using independent contractors can be a smart business move but without careful planning, you could be in for some expensive tax consequences. Give our office a call and we'll take a look at your options.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The closely-held corporate form of entity is widely used by family-owned businesses. As its name implies, the owners of the business are typically limited to a small group of shareholders. Many businesses operate for years as closely-held corporations without giving a second thought to a little-known danger: the personal holding company tax.
The closely-held corporate form of entity is widely used by family-owned businesses. As its name implies, the owners of the business are typically limited to a small group of shareholders. Many businesses operate for years as closely-held corporations without giving a second thought to a little-known danger: the personal holding company tax.
The personal holding company tax lurks in the background to prevent the use of closely-held family corporations as reservoirs in which to collect investment income. The government wants corporations to distribute income rather than enabling shareholders to build an investment portfolio subject only to the corporate income tax.
The tax is triggered by a corporation's percentage of investment to total income. It is imposed on undistributed earnings and is added to the regular corporate tax. One frequent trigger for the personal holding company tax is the accumulation of income earmarked for expanding the business. Despite its ominous nature, the tax can be anticipated and maybe even averted through strategic planning.
Some triggers
Here are some scenarios that have unfortunately triggered the personal holding company tax for other businesses:
A consolidated return group becomes unaffiliated, or an ineligible group, as the result of a change in stock ownership or a line of business
A large amount of insurance proceeds are invested until replacement property can be purchased
For asset protection purposes, a corporation holds investment assets or operating equipment without engaging in other operations
During a plan of liquidation, a line of business is sold and the sale proceeds are invested while management is attempting to sell remaining assets or businesses
As part of a plan to invest in a new line of business, a line of business is sold and the sale proceeds are invested while management is attempting to acquire a business or grow its new line of business
Two tests
It's important to remember that any corporation can be a personal holding company. The IRS has developed two tests: (1) an income test and (2) an ownership test.
Income test
The income test is met if 60 percent or more of the corporation's adjusted ordinary gross income is "personal holding company income." This type of income is frequently derived from investment properties and includes:
Interest, dividends and royalties,
Rents,
Mineral, oil and gas royalties,
Copyright royalties,
Produced film rents,
Amounts received in compensation for use of the corporation's property,
Compensation from personal contracts, where the corporation is not a personal service company, and
Estate and trust income.
There are some important exceptions to this list. Some types of royalties, for example, are excluded.
Note. The PHC income test is not a test of gross receipts. The income test compares gross receipts less the cost of goods sold to investment income less its direct costs. Gross profit margins are significant to the test and investment activities generally have few direct costs. Thus, an increase in investment income is leveraged for purposes of the PHC income test and an increase in investment income that is insignificant to total gross income can cause investment income to exceed 60 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI). Manufacturing businesses are at a disadvantage. Because of high cost of goods sold when compared to a service business that has little or no costs of goods sold.
Ownership test
The ownership test is met if five or fewer individuals owned more than 50 percent of the corporation's stock value at any time during the last half of the tax year. The ownership test also has some important exceptions. Some important - and common - types of corporations are excluded:
S corporations,
Tax-exempt corporations,
Banks, lending or finance companies,
Small business investment companies, and
Corporations in bankruptcy.
The personal holding company tax doesn't have to be an unwelcome and expensive surprise. If your business has experienced - or is planning - any of the events that could trigger the tax, give our office a call. Careful planning can help avoid or minimize the tax; at any rate, it can alert you to your possible liability for the tax.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Many people are surprised to learn that some "luxury" items can be deductible business expenses. Of course, moderation is key. Excessive spending is sure to attract the IRS's attention. As some recent high-profile court cases have shown, the government isn't timid in its crackdown on business owners using company funds for personal travel and entertainment.
Many people are surprised to learn that some "luxury" items can be deductible business expenses. Of course, moderation is key. Excessive spending is sure to attract the IRS's attention. As some recent high-profile court cases have shown, the government isn't timid in its crackdown on business owners using company funds for personal travel and entertainment.
First class travel
The IRS doesn't require that your business travel be the cheapest mode of transportation. If it did, businesspeople would be traveling across the country by bus instead of by plane. However, the expense as it is relative to the business purpose must be reasonable. Taking the Queen Mary II across the Atlantic to a business meeting in the U.K. could raise a red flag at the IRS.
As long as your business is turning a profit and is operated legitimately as a business and not a hobby, traveling first class generally is permissible. Even though a coach airline seat will get you to your business appointment just as quickly and an inexpensive hotel room is a place to sleep, the IRS generally won't try to reduce your deduction.
However, if your trip lacks a business purpose, the IRS will deny your travel-related deductions. Don't try to disguise a family vacation as a business trip. Many people are tempted; it's not worth the consequences, especially in today's environment where the IRS is aggressively looking for business abuses.
Conventions
Convention expenses are deductible if a sufficient relationship exists to your profession or business and the convention is in North America. No deduction is allowed for attending conventions or seminars about managing your personal investments.
Overseas conventions definitely get the IRS's attention. If you want to deduct the costs of attending a foreign convention, you have to show that the convention is directly related to your business and it is as reasonable to hold the convention outside North America as within North America.
Country clubs expenses
Country club dues are not deductible. In fact, no part of your dues for clubs organized for business, pleasure, recreation, or social purposes is deductible.
Some country club costs may be partially deductible if you can show a direct business purpose and you meet some tough written substantiation requirements. These include greens fees as well as food and beverage expenses. They may be deductible up to 50 percent.
Meals and entertainment
Younger colleagues don't remember when business meals were 100 percent deductible and deals were brokered at "three martini lunches." Meals haven't been 100 percent deductible for a long time and, like other entertainment expenses, the IRS combs them carefully for abuses.
Expenditures for meals, entertainment, amusement, and recreation are not deductible unless they are directly related to, or associated with, the active conduct of your business. The IRS also requires you to keep a written or electronic log, made at the time you make the expenditure, recording the time, place, amount and business purpose of each expense.
Even if you pass the two tests, only 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses are deductible. If you write-off business meals through your company and there is a proper reimbursement arrangement in place, you won't be charged with any imputed income for the half that is not deductible, but your company will be limited to a 50 percent write-off.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Whether a parent who employs his or her child in a family business must withhold FICA and pay FUTA taxes will depend on the age of the teenager, the amount of income the teenager earns and the type of business.
Whether a parent who employs his or her child in a family business must withhold FICA and pay FUTA taxes will depend on the age of the teenager, the amount of income the teenager earns and the type of business.
FICA and FUTA taxes
A child under age 18 working for a parent is not subject to FICA so long as the parent's business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership in which each partner is a parent of the child (if there are additional partners, the taxes must be withheld). FUTA does not have to be paid until the child reaches age 21. These rules apply to a child's services in a trade or business.
If the child's services are for other than a trade or business, such as domestic work in the parent's private home, FICA and FUTA taxes do not apply until the child reaches 21.
The rules are also different if the child is employed by a corporation controlled by his or her parent. In this case, FICA and FUTA taxes must be paid.
Federal income taxes
Federal income taxes should be withheld, regardless of the age of the child, unless the child is subject to an exemption. Students are not automatically exempt, though. The teenager has to show that he or she expects no federal income tax liability for the current tax year and that the teenager had no income tax liability the prior tax year either. Additionally, the teenager cannot claim an exemption from withholding if he or she can be claimed as a dependent on another person's return, has more than $250 unearned income, and has income from both earned and unearned sources totaling more than $800.
Bona fide employee
Remember also, that whenever a parent employs his or her child, the child must be a bona fide employee, and the employer-employee relationship must be established or the IRS will not allow the business expense deduction for the child's wages or salary. To establish a standard employer-employee relationship, the parent should assign regular duties and hours to the child, and the pay must be reasonable with the industry norm for the work. Too generous pay will be disallowed by the IRS.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
